SADO Attorneys Honored at CDAM Annual Dinner
"Justice for All" Award Presented for Investigative Work after Detroit Crime Lab Closure
The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan’s Awards Committee has selected a remarkable group of individuals as the recipients of their Justice For All Award. This award recognizes the amazing contributions of a group or individual in the form of legal representation or other extraordinary service. State Appellate Defender Office attorneys Marilena David-Martin (Detroit), Michael Mittlestat (Detroit), Peter Van Hoek (Detroit), and Thomas M. Cooley Law School Professor Alan M. Gershel (Lansing), Hon. Kim McGinnis (Taos, NM), attorney Daniel Signs (Philadelphia, PA) and SADO Chief Investigator, Linda Borus (Detroit) will be honored for their efforts investigating convictions where the discredited and closed Detroit Crime Lab Unit might have played a part. In five years, the attorneys in the unit with the help of Cooley Law School student volunteers reviewed 1,043 convictions. This review resulted in new trials for five clients, including one exoneration, and the release of two of these clients from prison.
Said CDAM Board Member and Award Committee Chair Stuart Friedman, “This award honors the extraordinary efforts made by the recipients to insure the integrity of the Michigan Judicial System. When faced with the misconduct within the Crime Lab, these courageous individuals stepped up and took the necessary actions to review potentially flawed convictions and then acted to obtain justice when violations were identified. This took many, many hours of work by people committed to insuring due process and fair trials for defendants and to insure constitutional protections for ALL. With this award, CDAM recognizes and thanks the recipients for their efforts and success.”
Current Articles
- Digital Literacy with The Friends U Need Workshop
- MAACS is hiring a Voucher Review Attorney
- Ask an appellate attorney: Does the prosecutor have to disclose that a witness changed their story before the trial if they have the witness acknowledge the inconsistency at trial?
- Post-Kardasz challenges to Michigan’s sex offender registry
- Using AI to score the Michigan sentencing guidelines
- New Jersey Supreme Court opinion: State v Nieves
- Safe & Just Michigan
- MAACS seeks summer interns/externs
- MAACS is accepting applications to join the roster
- SADO attorneys to argue before the Michigan Supreme Court
Subscriber Comments