Life Sentences for Youth Cases to be Heard by Michigan Supreme Court
SADO Attorneys Among those Arguing March 6, 2014
This past fall the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to three Appellants serving life sentences for offenses committed as youths, all of whom are arguing that their sentences are unconstitutional in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Miller v Alabama. On SADO's webpage, there is a collection of materials and links which will be updated regularly until the time of arguments in the Michigan Supreme Court. SADO Deputy Director Jonathan Sacks will be arguing on behalf of his client, Defendant-Appellant Dakotah Eliason, who was fourteen years old at the time of the offense. SADO Special Assistant Defender Pat Selby is arguing on behalf of her client Raymond Carp, who was fifteen years old at the time of his offense. SADO was also invited to participate and argue as amicus in the Carp case.
Current Articles
- Digital Literacy with The Friends U Need Workshop
- MAACS is hiring a Voucher Review Attorney
- Ask an appellate attorney: Does the prosecutor have to disclose that a witness changed their story before the trial if they have the witness acknowledge the inconsistency at trial?
- Post-Kardasz challenges to Michigan’s sex offender registry
- Using AI to score the Michigan sentencing guidelines
- New Jersey Supreme Court opinion: State v Nieves
- Safe & Just Michigan
- MAACS seeks summer interns/externs
- MAACS is accepting applications to join the roster
- SADO attorneys to argue before the Michigan Supreme Court
Subscriber Comments