Oklahoma State Police Seize Prepaid Card Funds with Mobile Devices
According to a recent article, Oklahoma State Police are currently using a new tool, an Electronic Recovery and Access to Data (ERAD) ™ device, to confiscate money from prepaid cards during traffic stops.
The ERAD™ device allows an officer to scan and seize money from prepaid cards. The company’s website states that the patented device helps law enforcement “document every confiscated credit, debit and prepaid card, and instantaneously provide key card issuer information that’s critical to your investigation. And if some of those cards are prepaid cards, ERAD™ gives you the ability, right at the point of arrest, to determine the value and immediately secure or freeze those funds.” The seized funds can be directly transferred to a designated law enforcement bank account.
Where an officer believes she or he has probable cause to seize a person’s funds, the funds will be seized, and if the person can establish the source of the funds was legitimate, the funds will later be returned. The Oklahoma State Police receives 7.7% of all seized funds later forfeited through the courts.
Sources: Aaron Brilbeck, “OHP Uses New Device To Seize Money During Traffic Stops,” news9.com, June 9, 2016: http://www.news9.com/story/32168555/ohp-uses-new-device-to-seize-money-used-during-the-commission-of-a-crime. Company website: http://www.officer.com/company/12189987/erad-electronic-recovery-and-access-to-data.
by Neil Leithauser
Associate Editor
Current Articles
- Work Smarter: AI for Life after Release
- SADO attorney to participate in the Michigan Supreme Court's Community Connections Program
- 2025 Project Reentry Workshops
- What sentencing judges think
- New report reviews progress made in the decade since Montgomery v Louisiana
- Safe & Just Michigan
- Ask an appellate attorney: What question do I need to ask in my statement of questions presented?
- Digital Literacy with The Friends U Need Workshop -- Tonight!
- MAACS is hiring a Voucher Review Attorney
- Ask an appellate attorney: Does the prosecutor have to disclose that a witness changed their story before the trial if they have the witness acknowledge the inconsistency at trial?
Subscriber Comments