Mini-Oral Argument on Application Granted
Mini-Oral Argument on Application Granted
People v Joseph Lee Jones, MSC No. 164110 (COA No. 353209), MOAA granted July 15, 2022
• Plea Withdrawal When Preliminary Guidelines Evaluation Changes
The Court directed the parties to address (1) whether the defendant is entitled to withdraw his plea where the trial court provided an estimated guidelines range with its preliminary evaluation of an appropriate sentence but did not advise the defendant that his final range could be different, see People v Cobbs, 443 Mich 276, 283 (1993); (2) whether the trial court indicated it would consider a sentence within a particular range rather than at the very bottom of the sentencing guidelines; (3) if the trial court did indicate it was looking at a range, whether the range it was considering was sufficiently clear to enable appellate review of whether the trial court imposed a sentence consistent with its preliminary evaluation; and (4) whether the trial court imposed a sentence consistent with its preliminary evaluation.
by John Zevalking
Associate Editor
Current Articles
- Work Smarter: AI for Life after Release
- SADO attorney to participate in the Michigan Supreme Court's Community Connections Program
- 2025 Project Reentry Workshops
- What sentencing judges think
- New report reviews progress made in the decade since Montgomery v Louisiana
- Safe & Just Michigan
- Ask an appellate attorney: What question do I need to ask in my statement of questions presented?
- Digital Literacy with The Friends U Need Workshop -- Tonight!
- MAACS is hiring a Voucher Review Attorney
- Ask an appellate attorney: Does the prosecutor have to disclose that a witness changed their story before the trial if they have the witness acknowledge the inconsistency at trial?
Subscriber Comments